User Blogs

Linda Flournoy

Various Interpretations on WHAT  KILLED the CLIMATE BILL:


Tree Hugger:

http://www.treehugger.com/files/2010/07/7-things-that-killed-climate-bill.php

 


Screenshot of Fox News

7. The Media

The media has done a woeful job of conveying the severity of the threat that climate change presents. 
Dramatic narratives like insubstantial errors in the IPCC reports, and coverage so lacking that the public has lost urgency.

Even the New York Times runs fantastic op-eds on the subject, but can't run a solid story about the actual impacts of global warming. Without information, the public won't hold officials' feet to the fire -- not mentioning "news" outlets like Fox News, who push the propaganda that global warming is simply a hoax.

Until the media gets serious about climate change -- and how efforts to address it would actually work -- the public will remain passive. 
By not doing its job, the media helped kill the climate bill.

 

6. US Chamber of Commerce

The USCC has obstructed progress on climate change legislation unabashedly from the beginning. Their stance was so backwards-looking (at one point, the president called for a "Scopes Monkey Trial" for climate change) that businesses began leaving the organization in droves, didn't stop them from encouraging the unfounded notion that climate legislation would be bad for business, bad for the economy, and bad for the American energy consumer.

 

5. Archaic Filibuster Rules

There are an easy 53+ votes for climate legislation in the Senate.  But Senate filibuster rules state that unless a party can muster 60 votes to break it, either party can filibuster away an ol' piece of legislation. Many view it as an affront to democracy.


Image via the NY Times

4. Barack Obama

Okay, so Obama didn't kill the climate bill. But he failed even to put it on life support
He failed to link the disastrous BP Gulf spill to energy policy.
He failed to make the case for energy reform to the American people.
He failed to get behind climate legislation. 
Failing to help legislation you've promised to back is pretty similar to letting it die.

 

 


Image via Reuters

3. Fossil Fuel Interests

Chicken-or-egg problem:   without Big Coal and Oil, who knows where the GOP or 'moderate' Democrats would stand --
the power and economic weight of fossil fuel industries have a funny way of changing politicians' opinions.

That said, politicians have an obligation to act in ttheir constituents interests -- and their' children and grandchildren.
Regardless, fossil fuel industry groups (like American Petroleum Institute and various coal groups) twisted politicians' arms and convinced the public that climate legislation would doom the nation's economy.

With faux grassroots campaigns, town hall meetings and other even dirtier tricks, they instilled fear and uncertainty, making centrists and Republicans reluctant to even speak the words Cap And Trade.


Photo via Politico

2. Centrist and Coal State Democrats

Sharing as much blame as #1, 
so-called 'moderate' Democrats refused to support climate action, fearing that supporting it would hurt their election chances,

They made a counterproductive laundry list of excuses and demands that made good legislation impossible.


Photo via a Green Living

1. The GOP

Yes, the immediate and most direct cause of the climate bill's demise was the Grand ol' Party.

With the exception of Lindsey Graham (for a while anyway) Republicans were unwilling to lift a finger to assist energy reform efforts. 
They immediately adopted slogans like 
          'cap and tax' or
          'energy tax' slogans,
distorting the legislation, sensing an opportunity to stymie Democrats' plans.

Most GOPers still say 'we need more information on climate change before we act' -- 
or worse, flat out deny that it's an issue.

GOP adopted a pointedly anti-science, morally corrupt line to score political points --
and Democrats and the White House for bowed to their tactics.

 

 

(to be continued...)

Linda Flournoy

Is there a way to participate remotely in the WRSC EVENT?

See the video Live and then - I guess - use this blog to add to the input, verbally and visually?

Linda Flournoy

When I search "distributed", I don't find the list.

In a related question, is there a way to Search  the Presentations?

Linda Flournoy

  Peter Meisen has just suggested a Triangle using COST, RISK and TIME to Compare Projects, Programs and Suites of Solutions

Linda Flournoy

Over the weekend, a friend asked me how things were going at "Green Space"... 

In the morning, I was thinking he had used "Green World" (as in Sea World)...

Linda Flournoy

Joe and Peter - Watch this first chance you get:

http://www.ted.com/talks/nicholas_christakis_how_social_networks_predict_epidemics.html

 

Interesting how some are already practicing Social Control, such as Rupert Murdoch (this is one of several videos):

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6737097743434902428#